SAHJ RAM DAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 7 OTHERS
/11729/2025 · 2025-12-08
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173878 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173878 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11729 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers :- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties for taking appropriate action on the representation dated 20.11.2025 of the petitioner which is given to the opposite prty no.2, contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite party no.2 and 3 to comply the orders dated 29.05.2025 and 16.09.2025 passed by the board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite party no.4 to 8 should stop creating problems in ploughing, sowing and harvesting the crop of the petitioner. iii. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that he filed a revision under section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 registered as REV 2291/2025/ Barabanki in which Member, Board of Revenue (Judicial) has passed an order of directing the parties to maintain status quo while admitting the revision and fixing date for next hearing. On the next date of hearing on 16.9.2025 certain amendment was carried out in the plot numbers mentioned in the revision petition and the Board of Revenue has permitted such amendment and has modified its original order dated 29.5.2025 to such extent. Despite such order being passed specifically mentioning the plot numbers on which the order of status quo is operative and revision petition is pending, the State – respondents, i.e., SDM Tehsil Sirauli Gauspur is permitting the private respondents to harvest the crop sown by the petitioner, hence, this petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeta Singh Chandel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sahj Ram Das .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
In case order dated 29.5.2025 and 16.9.2025 is not being complied with by the private respondents, the petitioner has remedy of filing an application under Para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual before the Board of Revenue. With the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 8, 2025 mks WRIC No. 11729 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench