IMRAN @ GUDDAN AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1692/2025 · 2025-12-10
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1692 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2. 2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 20.12.2024 as well as entire proceedings of S.C. No. 1433 of 2025 arising out of F.I.R. No. 678 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) BNS and Section 3(1)(da), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali City, District Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submit that in pursuance of the earlier order dated 04.11.2025 passed in the present case, the matter was sent before the court below for verification of the compromise deed. 4. It is evident from the record that the factum of the compromise has been verified by the court below vide his report dated 12.11.2025, which is annexed with the supplementary affidavit. The compromise deed is appended as Annexure 4 to the application, which goes to show that respondent no. 2 does not want to prosecute the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shri Raziuddin Ahmed Siddiqui, Sushil Kumar Gupta Imran @ Guddan And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Learned A.G.A. fairly concedes that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court below. 6. Hon'ble Apex Court, in catena of decisions, viz., Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further and the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter any further. 8.
For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. 9. Charge sheet dated 20.12.2024 as well as entire proceedings of S.C. No. 1433 of 2025 arising out of F.I.R. No. 678 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) BNS and Section 3(1)(da), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali City, District Hardoi are hereby quashed. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned, forthwith. December 10, 2025 VKS NA528 No. 1692 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench