HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2817 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that after concluding the investigation, thrice final report has been submitted, against which, the petitioner has already filed a protest petition, which is pending consideration before the competent Magistrate. 3. Learned AGA for the State do not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4. In view thereof, at this stage the prayer sought in the writ petition cannot be granted by this Court, leaving it open for the petitioner to approach the competent Magistrate for necessary redressal. 5. With these observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. November 24, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jagdish Pratap Pandey, Anoop Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Parashuram @ Parashuram Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench