VINEET KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9210/2025 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9210 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed by learned AGA for the State is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the
3. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.186 of 2025 under Sections 65(2) BNS and Section 5(m)/6 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Safipur, District- Unnao. 4. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the on 24.06.2025, daughter of the informant, aged about 7 years had gone to the orchard when the applicant caught hold of her and removed her pants. No allegation of rape was levelled. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS, for the first time, insertion of private part in the mouth of was leveled. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS, no such allegation was levelled. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and huge variance in the statements of victim and the argument of the counsel for the applicant that the family of the informant and the applicant are engaged in a dispute coupled with the fact that the applicant is in judicial custody since 16.06.2025 having no criminal history, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kirti Prakash Singh, Ramu Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vineet Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant- Vineet Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9210 of 2025 2
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench