ARUN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. U.P.
BAIL/6250/2025 · 2025-11-07
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173827 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173827 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6250 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.184 of 2024, under Sections 69, 70(1) of BNS, Police Station Khandasa, District Ayodhya/ Faizabad.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 20 years was met the applicant and thereafter on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed. The victim also admitted that she had gone along with the applicant at Ambala and physical relations were formed. The tentative age of the victim is around 20 years.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the statement of the victim and the fact that physical relations were formed on various occasions and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 06.04.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Arun Kumar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Chandra, Rohit Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arun Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 7, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 6250 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench