PREMAVATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PANCHAYATRAJ DEPTT. LKO AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/10865/2025 · 2025-11-13
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173822 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173822 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10865 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ved Prakash Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the records.
2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Additional Development Officer (Panchayat), Development Block Bakshi Ka Talab, Lucknow to decide the petitioner's application under Section 5 and 6 of U.P. Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of Family Registers) Rules, 19 requesting for inclusion of her name in pariwar register of late Nand Lal.
3. The learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State on the basis of instructions received by him has submitted that the recommendation has already been forwarded for taking action on the petitioner's application and a final order will be passed within a period of two weeks from today.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of in view of the aforesaid statement made by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions. November 13, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ved Prakash Sharma, Lav Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Premavati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Panchayatraj Deptt. Lko And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench