1 APHC010236592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 12275/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK KHADAR BEE, W/O KHADAR MASTAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, C/O 1-61, KOVILAMPADU, KOVILAMPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 523112 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO 135, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOVILAMPADU, KOVILAMPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KOVILAMPADU, KOVILAMPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, , KOVILAMPADU, KOVILAMPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYAT OFFICER, , KANIGIRI, KOVILAMPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE MANDAL PARISHADH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, , PAMURU, KOVILAMPADU, KOVILAMPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE KOVILAMPADU GRAM PANCHAYAT, , REP BY ITS SECRETARY, KOVILAMPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA 2 PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. REGULAGADDA VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri R. Venkatesh, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Smt. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri Hruthik, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M. Sudhir, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Official Respondents to consider the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 20.02.2025 (Ex.P.1). Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner would submit that the Order is passed withdrawing the cheque power of the Writ Petitioner dated 01.03.2025 without considering the Representation/Explanation submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 20.02.2025. The Final Order suspending the cheque power of the Writ Petitioner is passed on 01.03.2025 (Ex.P.3). 3. This Court has perused the said Order. At page 38 of the paper book (which is the second page of the Order dated 01.03.2025), it has been clearly noted that the Writ Petitioner has submitted an explanation. Although the date of the submission of the explanation has not been stated, the content of the explanation has already been referred to in the Order. 4. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the explanation submitted by the Writ Petitioner, has, in fact, been considered inasmuch as the content of the 3 explanation, has, in fact, been referred to in the Order passed by the Competent Authority on 01.03.2025. 5. In this view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the present Writ Petition is devoid of any merit. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. Needless to state that the Writ Petitioner is at liberty to avail any other legal remedy available under the statue, if so advised. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 07.05.2025 Vns