HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11915 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Nagendra Kumar Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1 to and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 2. In the light of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent, is dispensed with. 3. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite parties for compliance of order dated 23.10.2024 (Annexure No.1) passed by opposite party no.3 for removal of unauthorized construction made by opposite party o.5 over gram sabha Banjar land in Case No. 06038/2018 (Computerized Case No. T201808620206038), Gram Sabha Vs. Parashuram within stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite parties for final disposal of application under Section 460 of Revenue Court Manual dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure No.09) moved by the petitioner before opposite party no.3 and if necessary for compliance of the order such force if any required may kindly also be ordered in the interest of justice." 4. It is noticed that some proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code were initiated against the private respondent and writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nehil Khare, Govind Kumar Chourasia, Nagendra Kumar Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Sandeep Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) petition filed by him against the appellate order was also dismissed by means of order dated 17.5.2025 passed in Writ C No. 6738of 2025. 5. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the aforesaid proceedings the State Respondents have not made any effort to execute the orders passed in exercise of power under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. 6. It is in the aforesaid circumstances, this Court has put up query to the petitioner with regard tot he locus to file the present writ petition. The petitioner could not indicate either that he is complainant in the present case or he has any interest which he seeks to protect in execution of the orders passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. 7. It is for the aforesaid reason, I do not find that the petitioner has any locus to maintain the present writ petition. 8. Accordingly, for the aforesaid reason, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. 9. In light of the above, the petitioner is thereby dismissed. 10. However, it is stated that the Authority shall proceed in the matter in accordance with law. December 15, 2025 Muk WRIC No. 11915 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench