RAM SAKAL NISHAD AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME, LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7257/2022 · 2025-11-18
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173790 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173790 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7257 of 2022 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the Complaint Case No.18275 of 2021, under Sections 323, 452, 109 I.P.C., Police Station Maharua, District Ambedkar Nagar as well as summoning order dated 29.03.2022 passed by Civil Judge (JD)/J.M.-Vth, Ambedkar Nagar, with a further prayer to stay the entire proceedings of the aforesaid case.
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants are permitted to move their discharge application through counsel within two weeks from today and in case any such application is being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, within 6 weeks, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.
6. Till the aforesaid period of eight weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
7. In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Prateek Shrivastava, Vishram Kumar Chauhan Ram Sakal Nishad And Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home, Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
benefit of this order.
8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. November 18, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 7257 of 2022 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench