GHANSHYAM AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS.
/10711/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173783 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173783 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10711 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Sri Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to some defects that have crept in the petition, he does not want to press the petition and he seeks liberty file a fresh petition. Sri Anil Kumar Kushwaha, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. November 20, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sivendra Kumar Srivastav, Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ghanshyam And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 4 Others. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench