- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15235 WP No. 15512 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.15512 OF 2019 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: SRI. B. SHANKAR S/O LATE T.S.BYLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2214, 12TH MAIN, A BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.R. ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, C, O & M SUB DIVISION, C-7 SUB DIVISION, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU – 560 064. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), BENGALURU VIDYUT COMPANY, C-7 SUB DIVISION, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU – 560 064. 3. THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BESCOM, BENGALURU CITY DISTRICT, WEST CIRCLE, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15235 WP No. 15512 of 2019 BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU ELECTRICITY COMPANY, BENGALURU – 560 079. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.V.DEVARAJU., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 13.02.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-2 FOR PAYMENT OF A SUM OF RS.17,97,512/-, APART FROM RS.5,20,262/- AND IN ALL RS.23,17,774/- VIDE ANNEXURE-P, PASSED BY THE AUTHORITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; "(a) Issue a writ in the nature of the certiorari quashing the order bearing No.SaKaaNilm (Vi)/SaLe/HiSa/Sa/KiSa/Ka/4202-05 dated 13.02.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent for payment of a sum of Rs.17,97,512/-, apart from Rs.5,20,262/- and in all Rs.23,17,774/- vide Annexure-P, passed by the authority, and (b) For costs and any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, in the interests of justice." - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15235 WP No. 15512 of 2019 2. Memo dated 08.04.2025 has been filed, signed by the learned for the petitioner, which reads as under: "The petitioner submits that in the Consumer Redressal Forum passed an order to pay Rs.2,06,671/- with the scheme of supply will be change to LT3 instead of LT5. The petitioner has deposited Rs.2,60,000/- in pursuance of the order passed. The petitioner will pursue his remedies for change of plan to LT3 instead of LT5. The petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the above petition with liberty to take appropriate proceedings in appropriate forum in this behalf. The memo may kindly be taken on record, in the interests of justice." 3. Accepting the said memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52