Joseph Sriharsha and Mary Indraja Educational Society, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/11763/2025 · 2025-06-22
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17378 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17378 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010236742025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11763/2025 Between:
1. JOSEPH SRIHARSHA AND MARY INDRAJA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, PLOT NO. 102, HIGH COURT COLONY, VANASTHALIPURAM, HYDERABAD - 500 070 REPRESENTED BY ITS HON. CHAIRMAN AND CORRESPONDENT DR. REV. K.V.K. RAO
2. ST. MARY'S GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS GUNTUR FOR WOMEN,, CHEBROLU VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 212 REPRESENTED BY ITS HON. CHAIRMAN AND CORRESPONDENT DR. REV. K.V.K. RAO
3. ST. MARY'S WOMEN'S ENGINEERING COLLEGE,, BUDAMPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522 017 REPRESENTED BY ITS HON.
CHAIRMAN AND CORRESPONDENT DR. REV. K.V.K. RAO
4. DR. REV. K.V.K. RAO, , S/O. LATE VENKAIAH, PLOT NO. 102, HIGH COURT COLONY, VANASTHALIPURAM, HYDERABAD - 500070
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, K.K.GARUDADRI TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. ANDHRA PRADESH HIGHER EDUCATION REGULATORY AND MONITORING COMMITTEE, 2ND FLOOR, SREE MAHENDRA ENCLAVE, NRI BLOCK, (C BLOCK), NH-16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR
2
DISTRICT - 522501 REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
2. VIVEKANANDA VIRUPAKSHA The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Sri Sricharan Telaprolu, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners submits that the needful has been done and that this Court is not required to consider this Writ Petition any further.
2. Accordingly, Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Dt: 23.06.2025 Vns