HANUMANT PRASAD SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOREST LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/11263/2025 · 2025-12-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173720 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173720 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11263 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to sanctioned and give pension and other retiral dues to the petitioner taking into consideration the regular service of 13 years and 5 months rendered by with all consequential benefits. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to fix the pension of the petitioner after including the services rendered by him on daily wages basis and pay the arrears accordingly with all consequential benefits."
3. Learned counsel for petitioner has relied upon judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others reported in (2019) 10 SCC 516 as well as judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others [WRIT - A No. - 731 of 2024].
4. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Conservator of Forest, Devipatan Circle, U.P., Gonda or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Madhav Shukla, Satyam Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Hanumant Prasad Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
filed, the same is required to be decided in the light of judgments rendered in the cases of Prem Singh (supra) and Jai Ram Sharma (supra) in case the same are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 4, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 11263 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench