APHC010236392005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18111/2005 Between: 1. PULAPAKA PRAKASAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT., S/O. DAVID R/O. GOLLANA PALLI, GANNAVARAM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. THE LABOUR COURT GUNTUR DISTRICT AND 2 OTHERS, GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC GANNAVARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER APSRTC, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a writ,order or direction more particulary one in the nature of writ of Certiorari by quashing the order dt.13 I.D.No.283/92 on the file of the first respondent by declaring as illegal,arbitrary,unconstitution Constitution of india and various provisions of the ID Act 1947 and further direct the the 2nd and 3rd respondents to pay the back wages and other benefits on par with cleaners employed in APSRTC from the da employment till date and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18111/2005 PULAPAKA PRAKASAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT., S/O. DAVID R/O. GOLLANA PALLI, GANNAVARAM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE LABOUR COURT GUNTUR DISTRICT AND 2 OTHERS, GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC GANNAVARAM THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER APSRTC, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a writ,order or direction more particulary one in the nature of writ of Certiorari by quashing the order dt.13-5-2005 in EP.No.13/1998 in I.D.No.283/92 on the file of the first respondent by declaring as illegal,arbitrary,unconstitutional and violative of the Art.14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of india and various provisions of the ID Act 1947 and further direct the the 2nd and 3rd respondents to pay the back wages and other benefits on par with cleaners employed in APSRTC from the da employment till date and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI PULAPAKA PRAKASAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT., S/O. DAVID R/O. GOLLANA PALLI, GANNAVARAM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER THE LABOUR COURT GUNTUR DISTRICT AND 2 OTHERS, THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC GANNAVARAM KRISHNA THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER APSRTC, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a writ,order or direction more particulary one in the nature 2005 in EP.No.13/1998 in I.D.No.283/92 on the file of the first respondent by declaring as al and violative of the Art.14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of india and various provisions of the ID Act 1947 and further direct the the 2nd and 3rd respondents to pay the back wages and other benefits on par with cleaners employed in APSRTC from the date of employment till date and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 23051 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the 3rd respondent to release the back wages and other benefits on par with cleaners in APSRTC without reference to the orders in EP.No.13/1998, dt.13-5-2005. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 19543 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to fix a time scale to the petitioner and pay the same every month pending disposal of the WP. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 32508 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the petitioner wages of cleaners from the date of his termination till date. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC 3 The Court made the following order: Sri Bhaskar Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri P.Raghavender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through virtual mode, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 18.07.2025 MP 4 125 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18111 of 2005 Dated:18.07.2025 MP