ANAND KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/9913/2025 · 2025-10-29
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9913 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer:-
"(1) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite party No.3 to take suitable action on the inquiry report dated 21.06.2023 with respect to the corrupt practices made by opposite party no.5 and to take suitable action in accordance with law, in the interest of justice"
3. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents submits that charge-sheet has been filed against respondent No.5 and action is being taken.
4. In light of the above, nothing remains in this writ petition, no cause of action survives accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. October 29, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayankar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Anand Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench