Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173700 (ALL)

KAILASH NATH MISHRA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9866/2025 · 2025-11-03

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9866 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 4. 2. In view of the proposed order, notices to opposite parties no.5 to 8 are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents nos. 1 to 4 to immediately stop the harassment being meted out to the petitioners and his family members by the police officials; (ii) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to provide adequate protection to the petitioners and his family members from any kind of harassment or intimidation by the police officials. (iii) A Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus direct the respondents to take appropriate disciplinary action against the erring police officials for their illegal and unconstitutional conduct. (iv) Award appropriate compensation to the petitioners for the harassment, mental agony, and violation of fundamental rights suffered by him and his family." 4. Ms. Tripathi has produced copy of instructions letter dated 16.10.2025 provided by the Sub Inspector, Police Station- Gosaiganj, District- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Kailash Nath Mishra And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Sultanpur, the same is taken on record. 5. As per the aforesaid instructions, since the petitioners are accused in one case, therefore, for the purposes of their cooperation in the investigation, they have been called but they are not being harassed in any manner whatsoever. 6. Considering the aforesaid fact and without entering into merits of the issue, this writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage having expectation that the petitioners may not be unnecessarily harassed. November 3, 2025 RBS/- CRLP No. 9866 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench