Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. v. Pobi Technologies and Construction Pvt. Ltd. and Anr
Arb.A./2/2025 · 2025-07-29
S Datta Purkayastha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1737 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1737 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_
IA No. 02 of 2025 in Arb. A No.02 of 2025(d/o)
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited (A Government of India Undertaking) 5/1, Commissariat Road( Hastings), Kolkata Pin-700022 (Represented by its General Manager having local office at Jackson Gate (3rd Floor), Lenin Sarani, Agartala, West Tripura Pin-799001.
...... Appellant(s) V E R S U S
1. Pobi Technologies & Construction Pvt. Limited, A company incorporated under Companies Act 1956 having its office at Karanga Para Road Durgapur, Burdwan, P.O. and P.S. Cokeoven, West Bengal, Pin 713201.
2. The State of Tripura (Represented by the Secretary)Urban Development Department Government of Tripura, Agartala, Civil Secretariat, New Capital Complex, P.O. Kunjaban, P.S. NCC, District- West Tripura, Pin-799006.
.….Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Agniva Chakraborti, Advocate, Mr. Palash Debbarma, Advocate,
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kohinoor N Bhattacharjee, G.A., Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, Advocate.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT =O=R=D=E=R= 13.01.2026
This application is filed seeking restoration of the petition being Arbitration Appeal No. 02 of 2025 which was withdrawn by the appellant’s counsel on 29.07.2025. It is contended that the authorization to withdraw the appeal was not there with the counsel who appeared in the matter and that the order passed by this Court has placed the applicant in a precarious position as it had left the applicant remediless in assailing the legality and validity of both the award and the judgment.
We are not inclined to accept the contention of the applicant for the reason that the person who withdrew the appeal was a Senior counsel and it is presumed that he had the authority to withdraw the appeal as well. It is impermissible for the applicant to level allegation against the Senior counsel at this point of time and contend that he was not authorized to withdraw the appeal. Therefore, this application is rejected. No costs.
(BISWAJIT PALIT, J) (M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, CJ)
Manti D/B
PULAK BANIK Digitally signed by PULAK BANIK Date: 2026.01.15 01:00:14 -08'00'