Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173659 (ALL)

SAHIL @ CHANDU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/2536/2025 · 2025-12-02

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2536 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Sessions Case No.2814 of 2024, Case Crime No.496 of 2024, under Sections 351(2), 109(1), 70(2) of BNS and Section 5g, 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Gomtinagar, District Lucknow. 3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the co-accused Chanki Sonkar has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 27.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4697 of 2025. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who has been enlarged on bail coupled with the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 05.10.2024 and the criminal history of the applicant has been explained through supplementary affidavit, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayank Sharma, Kaushalendra K. Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sahil @ Chandu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Sahil @ Chandu be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 2, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 2536 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench