Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173628 (ALL)

JAGDISH KUMAR SINGH and ORS. v. D.M. LUCKNOW and ORS.

WRIC/29321/2021 · 2025-11-06

Alok Mathur, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 29321 of 2021 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Satyendra Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that an application under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was filed before the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Lucknow for correction of map and the said application was allowed by means of order dated 16.02.2019. 3. It seems that without disclosing the fact that certain persons being aggrieved by order dated 16.02.2019 have filed an appeal against the said order and it is during pendency of the aforesaid appeal, present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking compliance of order dated 16.02.2019. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the writ petition. He has submitted that for the prayer sought by the petitioners, a writ petition would not be maintainable. Apart from above, he submits that the petitioner has efficacious alternate remedy under Paragraph 460 of the U.P. Revenue Courts Manual, where all the orders passed by the revenue officials can be implemented. 5. Apart from the above, learned Standing Counsel has placed before this Court an undated order of the Tehsildar, Lucknow and on the basis of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Prakash Singh, Avinash Kumar, Raghvendra P. Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jagdish Kumar Singh And Ors. .....Petitioner(s) D.M. Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) written instructions received from Tehsildar, submits that order dated 16.02.2019 has been complied with. The written instructions are taken on record. 6. In the light of above, this Court is of the view that no further directions are required to be passed in the matter. In case petitioners have any grievance, they would be at liberty to invoke provisions of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 7. Subject to above observations present writ petition stands disposed of. November 6, 2025 A. Verma WRIC No. 29321 of 2021 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench