Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173619 (ALL)

BALVEER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9843/2025 · 2025-11-03

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9843 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Learned A.G.A. has produced a copy of the instructions letter dated 14.10.2025, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Uday Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned A.G.A for the State. 3. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite parties no.4 and 5 are hereby dispensed with. 4. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief(s): "a. writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding to the opposite party no.2 and 3 specially to the police of the District, Unnao not to harass to the Petitioners with the collusion of opposite party no.4 to 5 and provide safety to the Petitioners from illegal involvements in the false criminal cases, in the interest of justice. b. a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding to the opposite parties specially to the Opposite Party No.2 to take necessary action against the responsible police personnel who are lodging false criminal cases against the petitioners with the collusion of opposite party no.4&5." 5. Learned A.G.A on the basis of instructions have informed that the investigating agency is not harassing the petitioners, rather the petitioners have been asked to participate in the investigation in as much as they are accused persons in the F.I.R No. 791 of 2025 under Sections 352, 351(3) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Chandra Dwivedi, Mayank Tiwari, Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Balveer Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) B.N.S.,2023. 6. Be that as it may, since the petitioners are accused in the aforesaid FIR and their cooperation is necessary to conclude the investigation strictly in accordance with law, therefore, the Investigating Officer may take any appropriate steps which is permissible under the law for seeking their cooperation. The investigation may not tantamount to harassment and it is expected that the Investigating Officer may conduct and conclude the investigation strictly in accordance with law. 7. In view of the above, the petition is hereby disposed of. November 3, 2025 Preeti CRLP No. 9843 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench