RAJ NARAYAN CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DISTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/1839/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173606 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173606 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1839 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. In view of order proposed to be passed, notice to respondent No. 2 is dispensed with. Present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0210 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 110 BNS, Police Station-Umri Baigamganj, District-Gonda. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that general allegations of causing injuries to three injured persons have been levelled on four named accused persons. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. All the injured persons have suffered simple injuries.
Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is willing to cooperate with the investigation. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. However, he could not dispute the fact that there are general allegations against the applicant and injured persons have suffered simple injuries. Considered the aforesaid and perused the record so also the rejection order dated 31.10.2025 whereby it has been indicated that charge sheet has been filed and offence is punishable upto seven years. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanat Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raj Narayan Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Distt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
On due consideration to the material collected during investigation by the investigating officer, the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and injuries were simple in nature, so also the undertaking given on his behalf to cooperate in the investigation, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case in the light of
judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Musheer Alam versus The State of U.P. and another 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116, subject to his cooperation in the investigation. In view of the above, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid Case Crime number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/S.H.O. concerned with the following conditions:- The applicant shall report to the investigating officer within twenty days from today. He shall cooperate in the investigation and he will not influence the witness. The accused-applicant will remain present as and when the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned call(s) for investigation/interrogation. The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. The application is allowed. November 26, 2025 Vinay/- NABAIL No. 1839 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench