SUBHAM VERMA THRU. MUKHTAR AAM SUMIT KUMAR v. SRI UDIT NARAYAN SENGAR, SUB. DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE TEHSIL PURWA DISTT. UNNAO
/1164/2025 · 2025-12-15
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173576 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173576 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1164 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received has submitted that the claim of the applicant has been decided by passing an order dated 28.08.2025, the copy of which has been provided during the course of argument, which is taken on record and the photocopy of the same has been provided to learned counsel for the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that though the order has been complied with but he is disputing the order passed by the respondent, otherwise for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to the applicant if he is still aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent, he may be permitted to challenge the same by filing a writ petition. In view of above, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law. December 15, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Subham Verma Thru. Mukhtar Aam Sumit Kumar .....Applicant(s) Sri Udit Narayan Sengar, Sub. Divisional Magistrate Tehsil Purwa Distt. Unnao .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench