HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9216 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 17, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rudra Kumar Tiwari, I.M. Pandey Ist Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anuj Kudesia (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Yagya Pathak And 5 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Transport Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench