DINESH VERMA @ DINESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1579/2025 · 2025-11-12
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173555 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173555 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1579 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.343 of 2025, under Sections 64, 109, 333, 351(3), 308(2) BNS, Police Station Masauli, District Barabanki.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that wife of the informant was inappropriately photographed by the applicant and thereafter the applicant was exploiting her since long and when they resisted the informants were beaten up. The injury report on record indicate presence of as many as six injuries.
4. Considering the nature of allegations and six injuries no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the application is rejected.
5. However, the applicant would be at liberty to apply for regular bail in the event the applicant is apprehended in accordance with law. November 12, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhay Raj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Dinesh Verma @ Dinesh Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench