Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17355 (HP)

SANJAY KUMAR v. HRTC AND ANOTHER

CWP/9880/2025 · 2025-06-20

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9880 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.06.2025 Sanjay Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus HRTC & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Ms. Rinkle Khond, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This petition has been filed for grant of following reliefs: - “a). That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing Respondent Corporation regularize services of the petitioner from his initial date of appointment and treat petitioner as appointee on regular appointee with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice. b). That or in alternative, the respondent corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners immediately after one year, by modifying regularization order Annexure P-2, with all consequential benefits in view of judgment by this Hon'ble Court in case CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 titled as Vikram Singh and others versus HRTC” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved and the relief prayed for by the petitioner -2- has already been adjudicated Vikram Singh Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time-bound schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 20th June, 2025 Judge (Pardeep) 1CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 decided on 09.11.2023.