SHIV BADAN PRASAD v. U.P.JAL NIGAM THRU.M.D.6 RANA PRATAP MARG LKO.and 2 ORS.
WRIA/25375/2016 · 2025-12-12
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173547 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173547 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 25375 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 12, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Upadhyay, Rakesh Kumar Nigam Counsel for Respondent(s) : I.P.Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Shiv Badan Prasad .....Petitioner(s) U.P.Jal Nigam Thru.M.D.6 Rana Pratap Marg Lko.And 2 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench