NEELAM @ NEELAM PASWAN AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/9167/2024 · 2025-11-19
Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9167 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition nor there is any request for pass over or adjournment of the case, whereas learned AGA for the State is present.
2. Dismissed for non prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 19, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Gautam, Raj Kumar, Upendra Kumar Sagar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Neelam @ Neelam Paswan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench