APHC010236452000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 1139/2000 Between: 1. BODDEPALLI SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,EMPLOYEE, DHAVALAESWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, NOW A RESIDENT OF TUNGAPETA VILLAGE, H/O RAPAKA, PONDURU REVENUE MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. BODDEPALLI VENKATARAO, DIED, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. BODDEPALLI SEETHARAM, DIED, S/O SURYANARAYANA, HINDU,A GED ABOUT 38 YEARS, CULTIVATION, TUNGAPETA VILLAGE, PONDURU REVENUE MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. MODALLAVALASA VYUKUNTAMMA,, W/O APPALASWAMY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, VASUDEVAPATNAM, SANTHAKAVITI MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SANAPALA ANNAPURANAMMA,, W/O KONDAYYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, KURAMAYYAPETA, VASUDEVAPATNAM, SANTHAKAVITI MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. BADANA GOVINDAMMA,, W/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, TUNGAPETA, PONDURU MANDALAM, VASUDEVAPATNAM, SANTHAKAVITI MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. KUNA VIJAYA, W/O RAMINAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, TUNGAPETA, PONDURU MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2 8. BODDEPALLI SATYAVATHI,, W/O LATE VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O D.NO.37-3-6/1, ITI JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 9. PONNADA SUJATHA,, W/O RAVI KUMAR, D/O LATE VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO.37-3-6/1, ITI JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 10. BODDEPALLI VIJAY KUMAR,, S/O LATE VENKAT RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O D.NO.37-3-6/1, ITI JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 11. BODDEPALLI VINOD KUMAR,, S/O LATE VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O D.NO.37-3-6/1, ITI JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 12. BODDEPALLI ADHI LAKSHMI,, W/O LATE SEETHARAM, R/O 1-50, MAIN STREET, THUNGA PETA, LAIDAM, SRIKAKULAM, A.P. 13. BODDEPALLI ASIRI NAIDU,, S/O LATE SEETHARAM, R/O 1-50, MAIN STREET, THUNGA PETA, LAIDAM, SRIKAKULAM, A.P. 14. BODDEPALLI VASUDEVA RAO,, S/O LATE SEETHARAM, R/O 1-50, MAIN STREET, THUNGA PETA, LAIDAM, SRIKAKULAM, A.P. 15. S. RAJINI,, D/O LATE SEETHARAM, R/O 1-50, MAIN STREET, THUNGA PETA, LAIDAM, SRIKAKULAM, A.P. (APPELLANT NOS. 8 TO 11 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF THE DECEASED APPELLANT NO.2, VIDE I.A.NO.3 OF 2020 IN S.A. NO.1139 OF 2000, AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT.07-01-2025) (APPELLANT NOS. 12 TO 15 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF THE DECEASED APPELLANT NO.3, VIDE I.A.NO.6 OF 2020 IN S.A. NO.1139 OF 2000, AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT.07-01-2025) ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. DIST COLLECTOR SRIKAKULAM AND 3 OTHERS, - ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section ___________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2000(CMP 25401 OF 2000 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 3 IA NO: 1 OF 2001(CMP 7481 OF 2001 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of days 767 in filing the L.R.Application and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the Appellant No.2 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit them come on record as Appellant Nos.8 to 11 in the Second Appeal to represent the estate of the deceased Appellant No.2 and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay days 2899 in filing the LR.Application and pass IA NO: 5 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the Appellant No.3 and pass IA NO: 6 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit them come on record as Appellant Nos.12 to 15 in the Second Appeal to represent the estate of the deceased Appellant No.3 and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. . 4 Counsel for the Respondent: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO 2. GP FOR ARBITRATION The Court made the following Judgment: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 01.05.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the appellants. 2. Learned Government Pleader for Arbitration is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 09.07.2025 PSA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 1139 of 2000 Date: 09.07.2025 PSA