Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17347 (AP)

Relangi Srinu @ Pilakadu @ Chinnodu , v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/4958/2025 · 2025-05-08

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO IN THE THE CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4958 OF 2025 Between; 1. Relangi Srinu @ Age 30 Years, C/0 Gowda Rajanagaram Mandalam. 2. Veluganti Gangaraju, S/0 Venkata Ramana C/O Gowda, R/0 Raghunadhapuram Village, Rajanagaram Mandalam. 3 Gonaboyina Narayana Murthy, S/0 Veera Venkanna, Age 36 Years, C/O Yadava, R/0 Raghunadhapuram Village, Rajanagaram Mandalam. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED (A-1 TO A-3) AND of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. Pilakadu @ Chinnodu, S/0 Satyanarayana, R/0 Raghunadhapuram Village, Age 25 Years, by its Public Prosecutor The State High Court of Andhra Pradesh, At Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT that in the Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, praying Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition Petition under circumstances stated in the the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, officer to release them on bail in the event of their 216 of 2025 of Prohibition & Excise directing the arresting arrest in connection with FIR NO. South limit its Vll Additional Judicial First Station, Rajamahendravaram Class Magistrate, Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of of Grounds Sri B PARAMESEWARA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor of High Court of Andhra Pradesh on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following; f APHC010235022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4958/2025 [3369] Between: Rdangi Srinu @ Pilakadu @ Chinnodu , and ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED{S ) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petltioner/accused{S): 1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ORDER: This Criminal Petition, u/Sec.482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/A1 to A3, seeking anticipatory bail, in Crime No.216 of 2025 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Rajamahendravaram South. A case has been registered against the petitioner/A1 to A3 for the offence punishable u/Sec.7-B r/w 8-C of A.P. Prohibition (Amendment) Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State. 2. 3. 2 4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 17.04.2025, as per the instructions of superiors, the S.l of Police, along with staff, rushed to the scene of offence i.e., Back side of Gopi gari boru between bamboo trees and cashew mango trees in the limits of Raghunadhapuram village of Rajanagaram Mandal, and found five plastic drums containing 1000 liters of FJ wash, each drum containing about 200 liters of FJ wash (05x200=1000 liters), which was fit for distillation of ID liquor. When the S.l of Police enquired with some persons present at the scene about owner of the FJ wash drums, they revealed that the FJ wash drums belong to Relangi Srinu @ Pilakadu @ Chinnodu (A1), Veluganti Gangaraju (A2) and Gonaboyina Narayana Murthy (A3). 5. Heard. Perused the record. 6. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that major part of the investigation is completed except filing of charge sheet for want of RFSL report and prays to dismiss the petition. He further submitted that four antecedents are reported against the petitioner/A2 and three antecedents are reported against the petitioner/A3. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are the breadwinners of their respective families, and if they are arrested, their families will be put to starvation and prays to allow the criminal petition. 8. As submitted by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the petitioner/A2 has four antecedents and the petitioner/A3 has three 3 antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/A1 to A3 at this stage. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. 9. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI £ OFFICER To, 1. The VII Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. 2. Officer-in-Charge, Prohibition & Excise Police Station, Rajamahendravaram South limit. East Godavari District 3. One CC to Sri B PARAMESEWARARAO, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One Two CC’s to The Public Prosecutor of High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies GPC HIGH COURT GPC DATED: 09/05/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.4958 of 2025 TP* • 0SSEP2075 p ^^VCiKTent Sectjon.-'^^ o Oi c5^ DISMISSING THIS CRLP