Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173466 (ALL)

ARTI MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. AND 4 OTHERS

/13259/2025 · 2025-11-27

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13259 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, Mr. Shivam Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no.4, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material on record. Notice to the respondent no.5 is dispensed with as the writ petition is being decided at the admission stage itself. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "(1) A writ or order in nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to correct the seniority list so far it relates to petitioner and respondent no. 5, in the interest of justice, (II) A Writ or order in nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to promote the petitioner on Assistant Teacher in Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya (Junior basic School) w.e.f. 02.02.2015 and further award her same financial benefits as extended to respondent no. 5, w.e.f. 02.02.2015, in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.2 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.2 to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Madhavan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh, Shivam Sharma Arti Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.2/Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.2 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, after hearing all the stakeholders, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 27, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13259 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench