HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7234 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that due to typographical error in the prayer clause inadvertently the word 'Gonda' has been typed which may be permitted to be corrected as 'Sultanpur.' 2. The oral request of the petitioner counsel is allowed. He is permitted to make the changes during course of the day. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.3 has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to respondent No.1- Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur to decide Revision No.13/1993 in re reference No.339/1993, under Section 48 (3) of U.P.C.H.Act "Daddan Vs. State and others", expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid proceedings are concluded and decided in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1- Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur is directed to decide Revision No.13/1993 in re reference No.339/1993, under Section 48 (3) of U.P.C.H.Act "Daddan Vs. State and others", expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jnanendra Pratap Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Tribhuwan Nath Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidaton, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 16, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 7234 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench