[2025:RJ-JP:19606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7163/2025 Dinesh Kumar Kukna, S/o Mr. Mukhram, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of 25, Shri Ram Vihar, Saraswati Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Joint Additional Secretary-I, Public Health Engineering Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Additional Chief Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur. 4. Neeraj Piploda, Executive Engineer, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur. 5. Sumit Choudhary, Executive Engineer, Office Of Project Region, Churu ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Puneet Mr. Dinesh Kumar Kukna, Petitioner in person For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.P. Sharma Mr. Saddik Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/05/2025 1. Counsel for petitioner pointed out that post of Executive Engineer (one post) at Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur is a deputation post whereupon petitioner holding the post of Executive Engineer and posted at Public Health Engineering Department, was sent for deputation vide order dated 14.01.2023 (Annex-A5), however, deputation of petitioner has been cancelled and vide transfer order dated 15.01.2025 (Annex-A4), he has been transferred to join on the post of Executive Engineer in the Office of Chief Engineer (Urban and NRW) Jaipur, on the vacant post. [2025:RJ-JP:19606] (2 of 2) [CW-7163/2025] 2. Counsel for petitioner has raised an issue that private respondents No. 4 and 5 simultaneously were transferred against deputation post of Executive Engineer in JDA in place of petitioner, but in their posting order word “deputation” has not been indicated and moreover, against one post, two persons have been transferred. 3. Be that as it may, the appeal preferred by the petitioner against cancellation of his deputation and transfer order dated 15.01.2025, has been dismissed on merits by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur vide order dated 22.04.2025. 4. Counsel for petitioner, after arguing the writ petition for some time and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner has been transferred within District Jaipur only, obtained verbal instructions from petitioner, who is present in person and seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to join at his transferred place of posting. 5. Permission is granted. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /8