SMT. HAMEEDA KHATOON and 6 ORS. v. ANIL KUMAR PANDEYH and ANR.
FAFO/686/2003 · 2025-11-07
Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 686 of 2003 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Case called out in the revised call.
2. None is present for the appellant(s) when the case is taken up for hearing and there is no request for adjournment/pass-over made on behalf of the appellant(s).
3. It appears that since this matter pertains to the year 2003, appellant(s) has lost his interest in pursuing this case and therefore, by efflux of time, the appeal appears to have become infructuous.
4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. November 7, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Mohammad Saeed Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Prashant Kumar,J.) Smt. Hameeda Khatoon And 6 Ors. .....Appellant(s) Anil Kumar Pandeyh And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench