Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173421 (ALL)

RAKESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA v. CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. KOLKATA-700017 AND 4 OTHERS

/13729/2025 · 2025-11-27

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13729 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Satyajit Banerji, Advocate, on behalf the opposite parties is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Satyajit Banerji,learned counsel for the opposite parties and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no.3 and 4 to pass appropriate order for payment of stagnation increment to the petitioner which was due on 01.11.2022. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no.3 and 4 that after fixing the due stagnation increment the arrears of salary from 01.11.2022 to 30.06.2023 may also be paid to the petitioner alongwith 16% interest till the date of actual payment to the petitioner." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Deputy General Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. Lucknow and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sulabh Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Syed Haseen Ahmad, Satyajit Banerji Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava .....Petitioner(s) Chief Managing Director, National Insurance Company Ltd. Kolkata-700017 And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds for getting the benefit of family pension before the opposite party no. 3/Deputy General Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. November 27, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13729 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench