Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17342 (PNJ)

SUMER SINGH TOKAS v. ARVIND WALIA, DIRECTOR OF MS RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND OTHERS

COCP/871/2024 · 2025-01-29

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND SUMER SINGH TOKAS ARVIND WALIA, DIRECTOR OF MS RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND O CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Mr. Raghav Kakkar, Advocate, Mr. Shivpartap Singh Thakur, Advocate, Ms. Deepika Bedi, Advocate and Ms. Anjali Chauh Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for the parties has been arrived at between the parties by way of a settlement agreement dated 20.01.2025 agreement, counter on record as Mark Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the parties shall remain bound by the aforesaid settlement. In view of the aforesaid However, in case of default, the parties shall be at liberty to seek the revival of the present petition. Rule discharged. 29.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SUMER SINGH TOKAS Versus ARVIND WALIA, DIRECTOR OF MS RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Advocate for the Mr. Raghav Kakkar, Advocate, Mr. Shivpartap Singh Thakur, Advocate, Ms. Deepika Bedi, Advocate and Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties has been arrived at between the parties by way of a settlement agreement dated 20.01.2025. A photocopy agreement, counter-signed by the respective counsels has been placed on record as Mark-X. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the parties shall remain bound by the aforesaid settlement. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. However, in case of default, the parties shall be at liberty to seek the revival of the present petition. Rule discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-871-2024 Date of Decision: January 29, 2025 ........Petitioner ARVIND WALIA, DIRECTOR OF MS RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS .....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raghav Kakkar, Advocate, Mr. Shivpartap Singh Thakur, Advocate, Ms. Deepika Bedi, Advocate and an, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that settlement has been arrived at between the parties by way of a settlement photocopy of the aforesaid settlement signed by the respective counsels has been placed Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the parties shall remain bound by the aforesaid settlement. , the present petition is disposed of. However, in case of default, the parties shall be at liberty to (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2024 January 29, 2025 are ad idem that settlement has been arrived at between the parties by way of a settlement of the aforesaid settlement signed by the respective counsels has been placed Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the parties However, in case of default, the parties shall be at liberty to TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.04 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document