Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17340 (UTT)

MAYA RANI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/2201/2025 · 2025-12-11

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11050 I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 1 1 TH DECEMBER, 2 0 2 5 CRI MI NAL MI SCELLANEOUS APPLI CATI ON NO. 2 2 0 1 of 2 0 2 5 Smt. Maya Rani ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand and Another …Respondents Counsel for the Applicant : Mrs. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Tumul Nainwal, No.1 Assistant Government Advocate with Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, Brief Holder. Hon ’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a,J. According to the prosecution, Satendra, the son of Rajnath, the informant, was murdered. The informant-Rajnath died on 30.08.2024. The applicant is the wife of deceased Satendra. 2 . Heard Mrs. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent no.1. 3 . Mrs. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, Advocate appearing for the applicant submitted that the applicant 1 2025:UHC:11050 has filed the present application to direct the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar to conclude the proceedings of Sessions Trial No.220 of 2023, “State vs. Balwant Singh”, pending under Sections 302, 427 and Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, as expeditiously as possible. 4 . The said request has not been opposed by the respondent no.1. 5 . The present Application (C528 No.2201 of 2025) is disposed of directing the concerned court to expedite the proceedings of the Sessions Trial No.220 of 2023 and conclude the proceedings as per law and as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to the parties. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date: 11.12.2025 JKJ/ Pant 2