ANWAR ALAM SIDDIQUI v. DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION DIRECTORATE DEHRADUN
WPSB/19/2020 · 2025-08-06
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1734 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1734 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6897-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB/19/2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Kailash Chandra Tewari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
2. Mr. Kailash Chandra Tewari, learned counsel appearing for petitioner makes statement at the Bar that writ petition has become infructuous with efflux of time.
3. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 06.08.2025
Mahinder/
MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b089 23c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4 BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.08.06 17:43:23 +05'30'