RAJ KUMARI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/11421/2025 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173378 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173378 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11421 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner has sought for the following substantial relief:-
"To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding to the opposite party No.3 to consider the petitioner's objection under section 15 of Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has agreed to file an objection under Section 21 of Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and upon such an objection being filed within a period of two weeks, the authorities are directed to grant an opportunity of hearing, and thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of such objection.
4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 1, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shambhunath Mishra, Umesh Chandra Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Raj Kumari Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench