HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10390 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5. Learned counsel for the respondent no.5-Land Management Committee submitted that they are very much interested in completing the construction of interlocking on the chak road within the stipulated, however, it appears that the respondent no.6 and other persons are creating hindrance with regard to the said construction work. In the light of the above, the writ petition is finally disposed of with direction to the authorities concerned to ensure that the interlocking work on the chak road is done within the time period and the Village Panchayat is directed to take assistance of the Police, if so required. The Police authorities are also directed to act in accordance with law. November 10, 2025 Arjun/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Nath Dubey, Ankit Dubey, Lalit Shukla, Swati Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench