Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173371 (ALL)

SIDDHARTH MAURYA v. STATE OF UP THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/9417/2025 · 2025-11-10

Rajeev Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9417 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer to quash the impugned charge-sheet dated 4.1.2024 as well as the impugned summoning order dated 23.9.2024 passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Custom), Lucknow in Case No.92382/2024 arising out of Crime No.642/2022, under Sections 406,419,420,506,120B IPC, P.S.- Gazipur, District- Lucknow. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinai Kumar Singh, Lav Singh, Sandeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Siddharth Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of Up Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within one month from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). For a period of one month from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. The application is disposed of accordingly. November 10, 2025 Shravan A482 No. 9417 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench