Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 173366 (ALL)

RAMJEEVAN JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/9649/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9649 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly to quash the entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 1302 of 2002 State Versus Prakash Jaiswal & another arising out of Case Crime No. 214/2001, Under Section 420/467/468 IPC, Corresponding Section 318, 338, 336 BNS, relating to police station Laharpur, District- Sitapur pending in the Court of Learned CJM Sitapur as well as impugned charge sheet No. 244/2001 submitted by the Investigating Officer against the Petitioner in aforesaid case crime number and impugned cognizance order dated 20-08-2002 passed by the Learned CJM Sitapur, as contained in Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this petition, in the interest of law and Justice." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. November 28, 2025 Vinay/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Pandey, Akhil Anand Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Ramjeevan Jaiswal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench