[2025:RJ-JP:23353] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5780/2025 1. Sohan S/o Surendra, R/o Meghpur, Teh. Buhana, Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 2. Monika W/o Sohan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Meghpur, Teh. Buhana, Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brahma Prakash Mr. Krishan Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 19/06/2025 1. The accused-petitioners have filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.57/2021 registered with the Police Station, Pacherikalan, District Jhunjhunu for the offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 382 & 452 of IPC. 2. As per the facts on record, the learned Court below after taking cognizance against the accused-petitioners vide order dated 12.07.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 325, 427 & 459 of IPC, summoned them by issuing summons. Even after service of summons to a female family member of the accused-petitioners on 23.08.2023, they did not appear before the learned trial Court and, thereafter, bailable [2025:RJ-JP:23353] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5780/2025] warrants were issued to them. When the accused-petitioners did not turn up after issuance of the bailable warrants, arrest warrants were issued to them for secure their presence. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioner No.1- Sohan S/o Surendra is serving in Indian Army and he was not having the knowledge of the summons. Learned counsel further submits that no purpose will be served in sending the accused-petitioners in custody and more particularly when the accused-petitioner No.1- Sohan S/o Surendra is serving in Indian Army. Therefore, the accused-petitioners may be given the benefit of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners. 5. Heard. 6. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners so also the fact that the accused- petitioner No.1- Sohan S/o Surendra is serving in Indian Army and arrest warrants have been issued to the accused-petitioners when they did not appear before the learned Court below in view of summons issued against them, this Court deems just and proper to grant indulgence of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioners. 8. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Pacherikalan, District [2025:RJ-JP:23353] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5780/2025] Jhunjhunu in F.I.R. No.57/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioners they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /83