PANKAJ YADAV ALIAS PANKAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/3641/2025 · 2025-11-11
Manjive Shukla
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3641 of 2025 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State.
2. The captioned criminal appeal has been filed challenging therein, the
order dated 16.09.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Lucknow in Session Case No. 2504 of 2022, Case Crime No.157 of 2022, whereby the appellant had been summoned to face trial for the offences punishable under Sections 332, 325, 504 of I.P.C. and Sections 3(2) VA, 3(1)da and dha of SC/ST Act, Police Station-Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant, at the very outset, has submitted that the appellant shall surrender before the trial court and shall file the application for grant of bail. He has further submitted that this Court may direct the trial court to consider and decide the appellant's application for bail in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its
judgment rendered in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State does not have any objection if the aforesaid limited prayer is allowed in favour of the appellants.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this criminal appeal is disposed of Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Mohammad Alam Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pankaj Yadav Alias Pankaj .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
with liberty to the appellant to surrender before the trial court concerned and file the application for bail within a period of four weeks from today and if such application is filed, the trial court is hereby directed to consider and decide the said application, expeditiously keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). It is further provided that for the period of four weeks, no coercive measures shall be taken against the appellant. November 11, 2025 Satish CRLA No. 3641 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench