HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7422 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. 3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge framing order dated 16.07.2013 and entire proceedings of Case No. 5295 of 2012, pursuant to impugned chargesheet dated 29.04.2012 arising out of NCR No. 255 of 2010, u/s 323, 504, 506, 427, 352 IPC, P.S. Bachhrawan, District- Raebareli passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raebareli, District Raebareli. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned counsel for opposite party No.2 jointly submitted that vide order dated 09.09.2025 a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the trial court vide report/order dated 23.09.2025, the same is annexed as Annexure No. S.A.-2 to the supplementary affidavit. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Trivedi, Asheesh Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Asheesh Misra Ram Sanehee And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of matrimonial nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and charge framing order dated 16.07.2013 and entire proceedings of Case No. 5295 of 2012, pursuant to impugned chargesheet dated 29.04.2012 arising out of NCR No. 255 of 2010, u/s 323, 504, 506, 427, 352 IPC, P.S. Bachhrawan, District- Raebareli passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raebareli, District Raebareli are hereby quashed. 10. Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. November 11, 2025 Raj A482 No. 7422 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench