RAHUL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/8269/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173344 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173344 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8269 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 46 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 69 BNS, Sections 67 IT Act and Section 5(3) of UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, P.S. Jaidpur, District Barabanki. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the informant had met the applicant and on the false pretext of marriage physical relation was formed over substantial period of time and threats were also issued. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim admitted that she knew the applicant since the year 2024 and physical relation were also formed subsequently it was revealed that the applicant was muslim by religion. The tentative age of the victim is around 34 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the the fact that the relationship continued for a long period of time with the applicant who is aged about 26 years, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 8.2.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinay Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Rahul be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 30, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8269 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench