IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 10151 of 2025 Decided on 25th June, 2025 M/s Anand Associates …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s Sushil Jain and Ashok Kumar Thakur, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. When the case was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served, in case, the petition is disposed of with the direction that let the respondents to take a call on the legal notice that has been issued on behalf of the petitioner within 2 some reasonable time. 3. Taking into consideration the innocuous prayer made in the petition, the same is disposed of with the direction that let an appropriate decision on the legal notice that has been filed on behalf of the petitioner be taken by the Authority concerned within a period of four weeks from today. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2025 (Vinod)