1 APHC010236462020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3567/2020 Between: 1. SMT. CHAMUNDESWARI,, W/O. M. GURAVAIAH ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. NO. 15-692-F, PROJECT STREET, SRIKALAHASTI TOWN 86 MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. SMT PALLAKURU SUGUNA, W/O. P. VENKATARAMANA, AGED YEARS, RESIDING AT D. NO. 15/1238/A, PROJECT STREET, SRIKALAHASTI TOWN, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH SHO, SRIKALAHASTI I TOWN P.S., REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to Quash the proceedings in FIR No. 242 of 2020 of Srikalahasti I Town Police Station, Chittoor District and pass such other order or orders. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in connection with the crime in FIR No. 242 of 2020 of Srikalahasti I Town Police Station, Chittoor District and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. R CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: ORDER : When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, the petition may be disposed of. 2. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State is in attendance. 3. In that view, this Criminal Petition is disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner. This Court makes it clear that this Court has not expressed anything touching the merits of the case. However, the police are directed to conclude the investigation and file a 3 report. Further, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge if anything goes against her, if so advised. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.07.2025 ARR 4 86 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3567/2020 Dt. 21.07.2025 ARR