MANOJ KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (LAGHU SINCHAYI VIBHAG) LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/14121/2025 · 2025-12-08
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173333 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 173333 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14121 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief:-
"b. Issue a writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to grant the petitioner Grade Pay of ₹4200 w.e.f. 18.03.2011, along with all consequential benefits, including arrears of salary, revised pay fixation, revision of allowances, recalculation of pensionary benefits (if applicable) and all other admissible service benefits."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 8, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Garima Singh, Harshit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Manoj Kumar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Laghu Sinchayi Vibhag) Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench