Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17333 (ALL)

DEENANATH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/10759/2022 · 2025-09-14

Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10759 of 2022 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Achal Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 8 and 9. 2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner seeks the following relief: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's application dated 02.08.2021 in the light of section 474 I.P.C. within the stipulated period and ensure law and order situation alongwith protection of petitioner for tilling of concerned law." 3. We are of the view that this writ petition is not maintainable. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum/authority, in accordance with law. September 15, 2025 K.K. Maurya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Achal Singh, C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Deenanath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad