Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17332 (KAR)

SHRI PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY v. THE TAHASILDAR

WP/46035/2016 · 2025-02-27

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO.46035 OF 2016 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SHRI PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY, S/O LATE DORESWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/A NO.19, ACES LAYOUT, ACHALASEVASHRAMA ROAD, 6TH CROSS, SANJAY NAGAR BENGALURU-560 094. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI U BYREGOWDA, ADV) AND: 1. THE TAHASILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, KG ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. 2. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, CORPORATION CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, SUB-DIVISION, DASARAHALLI REGION, BBMP, HMT LAYOUT, 2 BENGALURU-560 073. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R SRINIVAS GOWDA, AGA FOR R.1, SRI PAVAN KUMAR, ADV. FOR H DEVENDRAPPA FOR R.2 & 3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE FINAL JUDGEMENT AND ORDER DTD 21.9.2015 PASSED BY THE LEARNED KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN REVENUE APPEAL NO.262/2011 (ANENXURE-Q) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL OF THE PETITIONER. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER On 02.08.2022, 18.08.2022 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today, when the matter is called out, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE brn